Completed at

Brave Little Beast

Financial Model

Built a financial model to introduce visibility into labor cost, project profitability, and capacity planning for a 3-person agency. The model became the foundation for pricing, hiring, and revenue decisions, enabling consistent 50% delivery margins and more predictable growth.

Context

In 2023, Brave Little Beast was a 3-person agency generating steady six-figure revenue with strong delivery processes, but no visibility into profitability, labor cost, or capacity.

We couldn’t answer basic questions like:

  • What does each employee actually cost per hour?

  • Are our projects profitable?

  • Which clients are most valuable?

  • What revenue is realistic for a team our size?

  • What does each employee actually cost per hour?

  • Are our projects profitable?

  • Which clients are most valuable?

  • What revenue is realistic for a team our size?

Operationally, we were organized. Economically, we were guessing.

Intervention

I built a cost-based financial model to introduce clarity into how the business actually operated. The model:

  • Calculated true hourly labor cost per employee (including overhead)

  • Defined break-even revenue requirements

  • Established a 50% delivery margin target

  • Modeled revenue potential based on utilization and team size

  • Simulated hiring scenarios to evaluate cost, capacity, and margin impact

In parallel, I audited overhead and identified inefficiencies across software, billing, and discretionary spend.

The full process took approximately two months, from analysis to rollout.

I built a cost-based financial model to introduce clarity into how the business actually operated. The model:

  • Calculated true hourly labor cost per employee (including overhead)

  • Defined break-even revenue requirements

  • Established a 50% delivery margin target

  • Modeled revenue potential based on utilization and team size

  • Simulated hiring scenarios to evaluate cost, capacity, and margin impact

In parallel, I audited overhead and identified inefficiencies across software, billing, and discretionary spend.

The full process took approximately two months, from analysis to rollout.

I built a cost-based financial model to introduce clarity into how the business actually operated. The model:

  • Calculated true hourly labor cost per employee (including overhead)

  • Defined break-even revenue requirements

  • Established a 50% delivery margin target

  • Modeled revenue potential based on utilization and team size

  • Simulated hiring scenarios to evaluate cost, capacity, and margin impact

In parallel, I audited overhead and identified inefficiencies across software, billing, and discretionary spend.

The full process took approximately two months, from analysis to rollout.

Results

For the first time, revenue planning was based on capacity and cost structure instead of intuition.

Established and maintained a consistent 50% delivery margin

Increased hourly project close rate ~20% after pricing adjustments

Eliminated negative-margin retainers through renegotiation

Reduced overhead ~30% through consolidation and cost controls

Introduced capacity-based revenue forecasting

Enabled structured hiring decisions based on financial impact

Pricing Corrections

Overpriced Hourly Work

We realized our hourly rate exceeded what was required to hit our margin targets. We reduced it by ~22%, improving competitiveness while maintaining profitability. Close rates increased ~20% in the following months.

Underpriced Retainers

Several retainers were operating below break-even. We renegotiated contracts to reach minimum viability and, where possible, align with target margins. We also began ranking clients by profitability, allowing us to phase out lower-margin relationships as higher-value opportunities emerged.

Overpriced Hourly Work

We realized our hourly rate exceeded what was required to hit our margin targets. We reduced it by ~22%, improving competitiveness while maintaining profitability. Close rates increased ~20% in the following months.

Underpriced Retainers

Several retainers were operating below break-even. We renegotiated contracts to reach minimum viability and, where possible, align with target margins. We also began ranking clients by profitability, allowing us to phase out lower-margin relationships as higher-value opportunities emerged.

A Defining Moment

During this transition, we declined a high-profile project after the client pushed for discounted pricing.

Under our previous model, we likely would have accepted based on prestige alone. Using the new framework, we determined the project would not meet our margin threshold and walked away.

Six months later, we learned the agency who accepted the work was struggling under scope creep and micromanagement, reinforcing that margin discipline also protects operational health.

Reflection

This process fundamentally changed how I think about running a creative business. Without visibility into labor cost, margins, and capacity, nearly every major decision is made on incomplete information.

This process fundamentally changed how I think about running a creative business. Without visibility into labor cost, margins, and capacity, nearly every major decision is made on incomplete information.

Want to work together?

Send me a message

Copyright © 2026 Adam Hayman. All rights reserved.

Want to work together?

Send me a message

Copyright © 2026 Adam Hayman. All rights reserved.

Want to work together?

Send me a message

Copyright © 2026 Adam Hayman. All rights reserved.